Inputs
Use monthly assumptions. Direct billing models payment processing, tax burden, disputes, and internal overhead explicitly. The MoR side collapses those responsibilities into a fee stack plus any fixed platform cost.
MoR이 수수료는 더 비싸 보여도 실제로는 세금·차지백·컴플라이언스·결제 운영 부담을 줄여 더 많이 남길 수 있습니다. 반대로 직접 결제 스택이 이미 충분히 효율적이면 MoR은 추가 비용일 뿐입니다. 이 계산기는 두 모델을 같은 월간 매출 기준으로 나란히 비교해 실수령액과 손익분기 MoR 요율을 보여줍니다.
Use monthly assumptions. Direct billing models payment processing, tax burden, disputes, and internal overhead explicitly. The MoR side collapses those responsibilities into a fee stack plus any fixed platform cost.
Enter your assumptions to compare take-home under direct billing and Merchant of Record models.
If direct billing already runs lean, MoR becomes pure drag. If tax and ops overhead are real, MoR may buy back net margin even at a higher fee headline.
| Metric | Direct Billing | Merchant of Record |
|---|---|---|
| Gross billings | — | — |
| Refund loss | — | — |
| Recognized revenue | — | — |
| Chargeback orders | — | — |
| Chargeback revenue loss | — | — |
| Processor / MoR variable fees | — | — |
| Per-order fixed fees | — | — |
| Tax burden | — | — |
| Chargeback case fees | — | — |
| Compliance + billing ops | — | — |
| All-in cost stack | — | — |
| Net take-home | — | — |